ArticleFuture oncology (London, England)2025
Prognostic value of Naples prognostic score for locally advanced gastric cancer after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy.
Article in Future oncology (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe parameters of the Naples prognostic score (NPS) include albumin, total cholesterol, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, and lymphocyte-monocyte ratio. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of preoperative NPS in locally advanced gastric cancer(LAGC) patients underwent radical resection after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (NCIT). RESEARCH DESIGN AND
methodsThe NPS was calculated and patients were then divided into two groups according to their NPS values as follows: NPS = 0-2 (group 1), NPS = 3-4 (group 2). Univariate and multivariate Cox analysis were used to identify independent prognostic factors associated with overall survival (OS), and time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (t-ROC) curves were carried to evaluate the discriminatory capacity of the prognostic scoring systems.
resultsA total of 117 patients were included in this study. The 1- and 2-year OS rates in group 1 were 100.0% and 95.7%, group 2 exhibited rates of 95.7% and 84.4%. Multivariate cox analysis demonstrated that NPS was an independent prognostic factor of OS (
conclusionsNPS is a significant prognostic indicator and can be a reliable predictor of survival in LAGC patients underwent radical resection after NCIT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.