ArticleNucleic acids research2025
Specificity in clustering of gene-specific transcription factors is encoded in the genome.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gene-specific transcription factors (TFs) often form clusters in the nucleus. Such clusters can facilitate transcription, but it remains unclear how they form. It has been suggested that clusters are seeded by the sequence-specific binding of TFs to DNA and grow by interactions between intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) that bring in more TFs. In this model, specificity in TF clustering must be provided by the IDRs. To investigate this model, we studied TF clustering by quantitative imaging of Nanog, Pou5f3, and Sox19b in zebrafish embryos. Using mutant TFs, we show that the formation of a TF cluster requires the DNA-binding domain (DBD) as well as at least one of its IDRs. Importantly, IDRs are not sufficient to join a pre-existing cluster. Rather, both IDR and DBD are needed. Finally, using chimeric TFs, we show that while IDRs are required to join a cluster, they are quite promiscuous, and it is the DBD that provides specificity to the clustering of a TF. Thus, for any TF to join a cluster, motif recognition is required, which explains the specificity in TF cluster formation. Taken together, our work provides an alternative model for how specificity is achieved in the organization of transcriptional machinery in the nucleus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.