ArticleJournal of psychosocial oncology2026
Article in Journal of psychosocial oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Listening to children's voices: Psychosocial and behavioral experiences and identity-related changes during the cancer trajectory.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2026Article
- Access to an mHealth Tool for Symptom Management in Pediatric Oncology Care: Triangulation Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A diagnosis of pediatric cancer generates emotional distress for patients and parents, particularly during prognostic discussions in the context of upsetting information and uncertainty. Emotional support from pediatric oncologists is cited as a key factor in psychological well-being during these conversations; however, gaps persist in addressing emotional needs. This qualitative study explored perspectives from 25 patients with cancer aged 12-25 years with an estimated survival of ≤50%, 40 parents, and 20 pediatric oncologists on best practices for providing emotional support during prognostic discussions. Using a structured rapid qualitative analysis approach that employed standardized templates and summary matrices, we generated four key approaches for optimizing emotional support: 1) deliver high-quality information with consistent reliability; 2) dedicate time, space, and attention to families; 3) validate emotions; and 4) preserve hope and positivity. These themes offer actionable insights to inform the design of future communication skills training as well as clinical interventions to encourage individualized emotional support for patients and families facing advanced cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.