ReviewThe British journal of radiology2026
Seeing is believing-on the utility of CT in phenotyping chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Review in The British journal of radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Quantitative computed tomography and predictive modelling for COPD exacerbations.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025Pooled it
- The Evolving Landscape of COPD Typization.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Pathogenesis, Diagnostic Advances, and Therapeutic Management of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Narrative Review.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a heterogeneous condition with complicated structural and functional impairments. For decades now, chest CT has been used to quantify various abnormalities related to COPD. More recently, with the newer data-driven approaches, biomarker development and validation have evolved rapidly. Studies now target multiple anatomical structures including lung parenchyma, the airways, the vasculature, and the fissures to better characterize COPD. This review explores the evolution of chest CT biomarkers in COPD, beginning with traditional thresholding approaches that quantify emphysema and airway dimensions. We then highlight some of the texture analysis efforts that have been made over the years for subtyping lung tissue. We also discuss image registration-based biomarkers that have enabled spatially-aware mechanisms for understanding local abnormalities within the lungs. More recently, deep learning has enabled automated biomarker extraction, offering improved precision in phenotype characterization and outcome prediction. We highlight the most recent of these approaches as well. Despite these advancements, several challenges remain in terms of dataset heterogeneity, model generalizability, and clinical interpretability. This review lastly provides a structured overview of these limitations and highlights future potential of CT biomarkers in personalized COPD management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.