Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40650918›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of geriatric psychiatry2025

Barriers and Facilitators to Implementing Cognitive Stimulation and Reminiscence Therapy for Dementia in Care Homes: Systematic Review.

Emily Fisher, Isobel Chick, Jane Fossey, Aimee Spector

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of geriatric psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emily FisherResearch Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8110-8405
Isobel ChickDepartment of Psychology, University College London, London, UK.
Jane FosseyFaculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Aimee SpectorResearch Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPsychosocial interventions play a vital role in addressing the complex needs of people with dementia in care homes. Cognitive stimulation and reminiscence therapy are recommended by the UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence to support the cognition, independence, and wellbeing of people with dementia, and crucially, they can be delivered by care home staff or non-specialist interventionists. This review aims to explore factors that influence the implementation of cognitive stimulation and reminiscence therapy for people with dementia delivered by staff in care homes.

methodsTen electronic databases were searched between 2000 and April 2024. Two reviewers systematically appraised the studies for inclusion using pre-specified criteria and their quality using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) and Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) checklists. Data was analysed thematically using a deductive approach based on the updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), and findings were synthesised narratively.

resultsNine studies were included; three focussed on reminiscence therapy, and six on cognitive stimulation. All interventions were delivered in care homes by care home staff. Many studies were excluded because a research team member delivered the intervention. Overall, the quality of the studies was low. Key facilitators to implementation were the availability of standardised manuals or resources, the adaptability of interventions, and staff training and support. Barriers included a lack of staff time and availability and a lack of perceived support from care home management. Most studies collected quantitative outcomes, and a minority collected qualitative information about implementation experiences and perceptions of the intervention. No studies collected qualitative data from people with dementia or their carers.

conclusionsThe review highlights the field's reliance on research staff to deliver interventions rather than training and involving care home staff in evaluating interventions. Additionally, there is a lack of qualitative data from people with dementia and their families regarding their views, preferences, and experiences related to participating in psychosocial interventions in care homes. There is a pressing need for high-quality evidence on the implementation of interventions for dementia, which involves collaboration, consultation and co-design with those who will deliver the intervention routinely and the people with dementia who will receive the intervention.

trial registrationCRD42022313337.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyDementiaHomes for the AgedNursing HomesHumanscare homesconsolidated framework for implementation researchdementiaimplementationlong‐term carenursing homespsychosocial interventionsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID40650918
PMCPMC12255387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.