SynthesisInternational journal of geriatric psychiatry2025
Barriers and Facilitators to Implementing Cognitive Stimulation and Reminiscence Therapy for Dementia in Care Homes: Systematic Review.
Synthesis in International journal of geriatric psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Barriers and Facilitators to Implementing Cognitive Stimulation and Reminiscence Therapy for Dementia in Care Homes: Systematic Review.International journal of geriatric psychiatry · 2025Pooled it
- Undergraduate Nursing Students' Experiences of Individualized Digital Reminiscence Using the InspireD App in Care Home Placements: Qualitative Focus Group Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- "The Window of Opportunity": A Qualitative Exploration of Individual Reminiscence in Care Home Settings.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Qualitative Insights on Preventive Group Training in LTC Facilities: Key Influencing Factors.International journal of language & communication disordersArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesPsychosocial interventions play a vital role in addressing the complex needs of people with dementia in care homes. Cognitive stimulation and reminiscence therapy are recommended by the UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence to support the cognition, independence, and wellbeing of people with dementia, and crucially, they can be delivered by care home staff or non-specialist interventionists. This review aims to explore factors that influence the implementation of cognitive stimulation and reminiscence therapy for people with dementia delivered by staff in care homes.
methodsTen electronic databases were searched between 2000 and April 2024. Two reviewers systematically appraised the studies for inclusion using pre-specified criteria and their quality using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) and Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) checklists. Data was analysed thematically using a deductive approach based on the updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), and findings were synthesised narratively.
resultsNine studies were included; three focussed on reminiscence therapy, and six on cognitive stimulation. All interventions were delivered in care homes by care home staff. Many studies were excluded because a research team member delivered the intervention. Overall, the quality of the studies was low. Key facilitators to implementation were the availability of standardised manuals or resources, the adaptability of interventions, and staff training and support. Barriers included a lack of staff time and availability and a lack of perceived support from care home management. Most studies collected quantitative outcomes, and a minority collected qualitative information about implementation experiences and perceptions of the intervention. No studies collected qualitative data from people with dementia or their carers.
conclusionsThe review highlights the field's reliance on research staff to deliver interventions rather than training and involving care home staff in evaluating interventions. Additionally, there is a lack of qualitative data from people with dementia and their families regarding their views, preferences, and experiences related to participating in psychosocial interventions in care homes. There is a pressing need for high-quality evidence on the implementation of interventions for dementia, which involves collaboration, consultation and co-design with those who will deliver the intervention routinely and the people with dementia who will receive the intervention.
trial registrationCRD42022313337.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.