Trial reportPsycho-oncology2025
Oncologist and General Practitioner Perspectives of Shared Care for Colorectal Cancer Survivors: A Qualitative Study.
Trial report in Psycho-oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThere is a growing body of evidence to support shared survivorship care. The shared care of colorectal cancer survivors (SCORE) randomised controlled trial (RCT) demonstrated that shared care is an appropriate and cost-effective model. Understanding the perspectives of oncologists and general practitioners (GPs) who participated in SCORE will provide crucial insights to support wider implementation of shared care and adoption into clinical practice.
aimsTo explore the experiences of oncologists and GPs who provided shared survivorship care for colorectal cancer survivors within the SCORE RCT, focussing on perceptions of acceptability and appropriateness of shared care, and facilitators and barriers to implementation.
methodsThis qualitative descriptive study utilised semi-structured interviews for data collection. Interviews were recorded and transcribed, and data analysed by hybrid deductive/inductive thematic analysis.
resultsInterviews from 20 HCPs (13 GPs and 7 oncologists) were analysed. Seven themes were developed describing overall acceptance of the shared care model, the importance and challenges regarding bilateral communication between providers, mixed views on the need for GP training, and patients suitable for shared care. The need to support GPs with a direct hospital-based contact person, as well as clear guidance on their role, was emphasised, as was the need for care coordination and logistical support.
conclusionsOur study offers novel findings regarding shared care from the perspective of participants who have direct experience with delivering the model. While shared care was broadly supported by both GPs and specialists, successful implementation requires agreed-upon bilateral communication, clear guidance for GPs, and coordination support. CLINICAL
trial registrationThe Shared Care for Colorectal Cancer (SCORE) Trial is registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12617000004369p. Registered on 3 January 2017; protocol version 4 approved 24 February 2017.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.