ArticleNeurosurgical review2025
Integrated clinicopathological-radiomic-blood model for glioma survival prediction via machine learning: a multicenter cohort study.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGlioma is characterized by a poor prognosis and limited possibilities for treatment. Previous studies have developed prediction models for glioma using genetic, clinical, pathological, imaging and other aspects; however, few studies have combined these data. The current study is intended to fully utilize medical data from the routine practice of glioma care and develop a model with the assistance of machine learning.
methodsMultiple factors-including demographic features, radiomic features, laboratory biomarkers, and pathological features-were collected from two Class Three hospitals in China. Preoperative images and blood tests were quantified with machine learning methods. The survival time was documented during follow-up. Multivariate Cox regression and seven machine learning algorithms were used for modeling.
resultsA total of 674 glioma patients from two centers were enrolled. Fifteen radiomic features (RFs) and ten laboratory biomarkers were used to create the RF score and blood score. A clinicopathological-radiomic-blood model (CRBM) was created to stratify the mortality risk of glioma patients (P < 0.0001). The AUC of the Cox-based model was 0.913 (0.886-0.940) on the training dataset and 0.802 (0.738-0.865) on the validation dataset, and the AUCs of the XGBoost model on the same datasets were 0.954 (0.935-0.973) and 0.761 (0.693-0.829), respectively. The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method suggested the contribution of preoperative imaging and laboratory data to the model.
conclusionThe CRBM is able to predict the survival of glioma patients with acceptable accuracy. Our work suggests the considerable potential of combined clinically derived data in predicting glioma survival and the utility of machine learning in variable selection and model construction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40650816What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.