Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40650746›Full record

ArticlePediatric cardiology2026

Prenatal diagnosis of absent right with persistent left superior vena cava: a case series.

Stephen Worrall, Rahul Mital, James Strainic

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Stephen WorrallRainbow Babies & Children's Hospital, Cleveland, USA. stephen.worrall@UHhospitals.org.
Rahul MitalRainbow Babies & Children's Hospital, Cleveland, USA.
James StrainicRainbow Babies & Children's Hospital, Cleveland, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Persistence of a left superior vena cava (PLSVC) is the most common thoracic venous anomaly, seen in 0.3-0.5% of patients. In rare cases (0.07-0.13% of patients), however, it is associated with the absence of the right superior vena cava (RSVC), a condition known as isolated PLSVC, or IPLSVC (Kusaka et al. in JA Clin Rep, 2015; Bartram et al. in Am J Cardiol 80(2):175-183, 1997). Absent right with PLSVC itself is usually not hemodynamically significant; its discovery, however, has significant implications, specifically for future cardiac inventions such as cardiac catheterization and pacemaker placement. It is also associated with other pathologies such as coarctation of the aorta, right sided aortic arch, valvular abnormalities, and arrhythmias secondary to coronary sinus dilation (Kusaka et al. in JA Clin Rep, 2015; Bartram et al. in Am J Cardiol 80(2):175-183, 1997). For this reason, awareness of this anatomy and its variations remains critically important. It was traditionally found on autopsy or during the time of invasive cardiac procedures; but with advances in fetal echocardiography, it has become more common to be found prenatally, with an opportunity for follow-up to monitor for any complications and associated findings (Guarnier et al. in Pediatr Cardiol27(5):646-648, 2006; Kahramanoglu et al. Pediatr Cardiol 45(2):377-384, 2024). In the following series, we present the cases of seven individuals with maternal fetal echocardiographic evidence of absent right with PLSVC and associated findings on postnatal evaluation.

Indexed as

Persistent Left Superior Vena CavaUltrasonography, PrenatalVena Cava, SuperiorAdultEchocardiographyFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMalePregnancyAbsent right with PLSVCCongenital heart defectFetal echocardiographySystemic venous anomalies

Identifiers

PMID40650746
PMCPMC12945967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.