SynthesisEuropean journal of pediatrics2025
Leveraging ChatGPT to strengthen pediatric healthcare systems: a systematic review.
Synthesis in European journal of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Performance of artificial intelligence chatbots in providing feeding management and oral health guidance for children with cleft lip and palate: ChatGPT 5.2 vs Gemini 3 Pro.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the quality, reliability, and readability of ChatGPT-4 responses related to the treatment and rehabilitation of children with cerebral palsy.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
- Large Language Models Using Clinical Text in Pediatrics: A Scoping Review.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Assessing large language model responses to pediatric depression FAQs: a cross-sectional study on readability, accuracy, and sentiment.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Performance of ChatGPT-4o in Analyzing Oral Mucosal Lesions: A Comparative Study with Experts.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This systematic review is the first to investigate ChatGPT's applications in pediatric healthcare systems by assessing its accuracy and readability, with a focus on its impact across key areas such as clinical decision-making, clinical documentation, patient education, and training. The primary question guiding this review is: How does ChatGPT impact pediatric healthcare systems, for example, in terms of improving patient education, enhancing providers' efficiency, and assisting with clinical decision-making? A systematic review was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science (February 16, 2025). Inclusion criteria encompassed peer-reviewed studies evaluating ChatGPT in pediatric healthcare (ages 0-18 and guardians). Of 475 screened articles, 58 met eligibility criteria. Two independent reviewers extracted data on study characteristics, intervention types, outcomes, and results. ChatGPT's primary applications were patient education (n = 38), clinical decision-making (n = 12), and clinical documentation (n = 5). Accuracy was highest in patient education, where it generated educational materials and answered FAQs, though readability was often at a high school level, necessitating adaptation. Clinical documentation benefits included improved efficiency in drafting notes and discharge instructions. However, clinical decision-making and training (n = 3) showed mixed accuracy, particularly in management recommendations and patient care plans.
conclusionChatGPT demonstrates potential in enhancing physician efficiency and tailoring patient education in pediatric healthcare. However, most studies relied on observational designs, with only one quasi-experimental study. Further experimental research is required to evaluate AI's impact on pediatric care system effectiveness and patient outcomes. WHAT IS KNOWN: • AI has been increasingly integrated into pediatric healthcare, particularly in imaging, diagnostics, and decision support. • Prior studies have explored LLMs like ChatGPT in medical education and training. WHAT IS NEW: • This is the first systematic review assessing ChatGPT's broader applications in pediatric healthcare, including decision-making, patient education, clinical documentation, and training. • ChatGPT shows high accuracy in patient education and documentation but variable performance in decision-making and training, emphasizing the need for medical supervision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40650728What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.