ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2025
Standard operating procedures and learning curve analysis for surgical assistants in robot-assisted distal pancreatectomy.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Learning curve and perioperative outcomes of robotic-assisted distal pancreatectomy: a single-center study.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Robot-assisted pancreatic surgery (RPS) is increasingly adopted across institutions. While structured training and longitudinal skill acquisition are essential for optimal outcomes, the learning progression of surgical assistants in RPS remains inadequately characterized. This study presents our institution's standard operating procedures (SOP) for robot-assisted distal pancreatectomy (RDP) developed through a single-team cohort experience and defines the assistant learning curve based on operative time, thereby establishing evidence-based benchmarks for RPS training programs. In this retrospective study, data of consecutive patients who underwent RDP in our team from November 2022 to March 2025 were analyzed. The assistant learning curve was constructed using cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis of operative time. The preoperative parameters, intraoperative outcomes, and postoperative metrics were compared between phases. Ninety-one patients were included in this study. Based on operative time analysis, the learning curve was stratified into two distinct phases: the initial learning phase (cases 1-43) and subsequent proficiency phase (cases 44-91). Operative duration and estimated blood loss were significantly greater during the learning phase compared to the proficiency phase. Among patients scheduled for spleen-preserving RDP, while overall spleen preservation rates were comparable between phases, proficiency phase cases demonstrated significantly superior splenic vessel preservation rates. Our RDP-specific SOP demonstrates safety and efficacy, with assistant proficiency significantly improving after 43 cases under expert supervision. Quantified learning thresholds provide validated benchmarks for structured robotic surgery training programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40650697What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.