ReviewArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2025
Fertility preservation in females requiring gonadotoxic therapy should be more than freezing measures before therapy - secondary fertility preservation and menopause care management after therapy should also be considered.
Review in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The feasibility of ovarian tissue cryopreservation in selected females after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.Bone marrow transplantation · 2026Article
- Fertility preservation in 2026: current landscape in Europe and the United States for children and adolescents undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation-recommendations on behalf of the Westhafen Intercontinental Group.Bone marrow transplantation · 2026Review
- Fertility Preservation in 2026: Current Landscape in Europe and the United States for Children and Adolescents Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation - Recommendations on Behalf of the Westhafen Intercontinental Group.Transplantation and cellular therapy · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To date, fertility preservation has mainly been offered to patients prior to gonadotoxic treatment. Ovarian reserve is assessed by analysing blood levels of anti-müllerian hormone (AMH), and gonadal cells or tissue are cryopreserved if indicated and requested by the patient. If primary fertility preservation (Primary FertiProtekt) before gonadotoxic treatment was not performed or was ineffective, secondary fertility preservation should be considered approximately one year after treatment based on a more extensive ovarian reserve analysis including menstrual cycle pattern, antral follicle count, and serum levels of AMH, estradiol and follicle stimulating hormone. Ovarian reserve analysis is also required to consider endocrine treatment in (pre) menopausal patients. Both approaches require the fertility preservation treatment to be tailored to the ovarian reserve status, type of gonadotoxic therapy. For secondary fertility preservation (Secondary FertiProtekt), oocyte freezing may be considered if ovarian reserve is not too low. Monthly treatment cycles, natural cycle or minimal stimulation protocols and follicle aspiration without anesthesia should be preferred. Menopause care management (MenoProtekt) involves acute menopausal symptom relief and prevention of chronic non-communicable diseases. The management needs to be individualized based on type of disease (hormone-dependent or -independent).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.