ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2025
Prediction of spontaneous preterm birth in pregnant women using machine learning.
Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning to predict adverse perinatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Article
- Predictive value of uterine electromyography coupled with transvaginal ultrasound cervical assessment in women at risk of preterm delivery.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeSpontaneous preterm birth (sPTB) is a significant global health concern, contributing to adverse outcomes for both pregnant women and newborns. Early identification of women with risk of sPTB is essential for mitigating these negative effects and improving maternal and neonatal health outcomes. The aim of this study is to explore the feasibility of using machine learning to predict sPTB risk and to analyze the contribution of variables.
methodsAll data were collected retrospectively. Prediction models were developed using eight different machine learning algorithms combined with six variable selection methods. The models' predictive performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), area under the precision recall curve (AUPRC), accuracy, sensitivity, F1-score, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value.
resultsA total of 1122 pregnant women, of whom 187 had preterm birth and 935 had term birth, were enrolled. The model by combining the categorical boosting algorithm and backward elimination had the best predictive performance with the highest AUROC (0.8762) and AUPRC (0.7061), and the Brier score was 0.12 on the test set. The top 5 variables for predicting sPTB risk in this study were free triiodothyronine, albumin/globulin, thyroglobulin antibody, total thyroxine, red cell volume distribution width.
conclusionsThe machine learning model may help identify pregnant women at high risk of sPTB, and individual risk factor analysis could provide reference for clinical decision. However, as some key variables are not part of routine laboratory tests during pregnancy worldwide, the model's generalizability and clinical applicability require further study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.