Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40650586›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2025

Effects of 25-hydroxycholecalciferol supplementation during gestation on sow performance, offspring development, and intestinal microbiota in sows and piglets.

Shengyu Xu, Changqin Wang, Qiang Zhou, Yifan Wang, Hui Yan, Jiayong Tang, Ruinan Zhang, Hua Li, Xilun Zhao, Xuemei Jiang and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Shengyu XuAnimal Nutrition Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, Key laboratory of Animal Disease-resistant Nutrition, Sichuan Province, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Ministry of Education, Chengdu 611130, Sichuan, P. R. China.ORCID 0000-0002-4415-8542
Changqin WangAnimal Nutrition Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, Key laboratory of Animal Disease-resistant Nutrition, Sichuan Province, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Ministry of Education, Chengdu 611130, Sichuan, P. R. China.
Qiang ZhouAnimal Nutrition Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, Key laboratory of Animal Disease-resistant Nutrition, Sichuan Province, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Ministry of Education, Chengdu 611130, Sichuan, P. R. China.
Yifan WangAnimal Nutrition Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, Key laboratory of Animal Disease-resistant Nutrition, Sichuan Province, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Ministry of Education, Chengdu 611130, Sichuan, P. R. China.
Hui YanAnimal Nutrition Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, Key laboratory of Animal Disease-resistant Nutrition, Sichuan Province, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Ministry of Education, Chengdu 611130, Sichuan, P. R. China.ORCID 0000-0001-7476-3914
Jiayong TangAnimal Nutrition Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, Key laboratory of Animal Disease-resistant Nutrition, Sichuan Province, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Ministry of Education, Chengdu 611130, Sichuan, P. R. China.
Ruinan ZhangAnimal Nutrition Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, Key laboratory of Animal Disease-resistant Nutrition, Sichuan Province, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Ministry of Education, Chengdu 611130, Sichuan, P. R. China.
Hua LiAnimal Nutrition Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, Key laboratory of Animal Disease-resistant Nutrition, Sichuan Province, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Ministry of Education, Chengdu 611130, Sichuan, P. R. China.
Xilun ZhaoAnimal Nutrition Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, Key laboratory of Animal Disease-resistant Nutrition, Sichuan Province, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Ministry of Education, Chengdu 611130, Sichuan, P. R. China.
Xuemei JiangAnimal Nutrition Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, Key laboratory of Animal Disease-resistant Nutrition, Sichuan Province, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Ministry of Education, Chengdu 611130, Sichuan, P. R. China.
Guangmang LiuAnimal Nutrition Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, Key laboratory of Animal Disease-resistant Nutrition, Sichuan Province, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Ministry of Education, Chengdu 611130, Sichuan, P. R. China.ORCID 0000-0003-2385-7528
Hefeng LuoDekon Food and Agriculture Group, Chengdu, China.
De WuAnimal Nutrition Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, Key laboratory of Animal Disease-resistant Nutrition, Sichuan Province, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Ministry of Education, Chengdu 611130, Sichuan, P. R. China.ORCID 0000-0002-8348-4199
Lianqiang CheAnimal Nutrition Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, Key laboratory of Animal Disease-resistant Nutrition, Sichuan Province, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Ministry of Education, Chengdu 611130, Sichuan, P. R. China.ORCID 0000-0002-0940-7275

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 25-hydroxycholecalciferol (25OHD3) is a metabolite of vitamin D (VD) and status biomarker of VD in blood. We investigate the effect of dietary 25OHD3 supplementation on gestation sow litter performance, milk composition, nutrient metabolism, the growth performance of offspring, and intestinal microbiota. A total of 60 sows were randomly allocated to receive VD3 diet (CON, 50 µg·kg-1, n = 30) or 25OHD3 diet (50 µg·kg-1, n = 30). All sows had the same diet during lactation. No difference was observed in litter size at farrowing and piglet performance at weaning between treatments. Sows fed 25OHD3 diet had increased plasma concentrations of prolactin (P = 0.05) and tended to have increased estradiol concentrations (P = 0.09) at farrowing. Sows fed 25OHD3 diet tended to have higher dry matter and fat contents in milk on day 10 of lactation (P = 0.08), increased plasma calcium concentration in newborn piglets (P < 0.05), and proportions of tibia and femur to body weights (P < 0.05) in weaning piglets. Newborn piglets from sows fed 25OHD3 diet had increased crypt depth (P < 0.05), and decreased ratio of villus height to crypt depth (P < 0.05). Compared with the VD3 diet, sows fed the 25OHD3 diet tended to have more fecal Firmicutes (P = 0.09) and fewer Campylobacterota (P < 0.05) at farrowing, and had fewer Bacteroidota and Spirochaetota (P < 0.05) at the end of lactation. Moreover, the weaning piglets from sows fed 25OHD3 diet had a higher abundance of Pseudomonas (P < 0.05), and a lower abundance of Bacteroides, Megasphaera, CAG-873, and Olsenella (P < 0.05) in colonic chyme. We conclude that 25OHD3 supplementation in gestation sows improves milk composition, increases the blood calcium concentration of newborn piglets, the tibia and femur weight of weaned piglets, and alters the intestinal microbiota of both sows and piglets.

Indexed as

CalcifediolGastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimal FeedAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsAnimals, NewbornDietDietary SupplementsFemaleMaternal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaMilkPregnancySwineCalcifediol25-hydroxycholecalciferolbone developmentintestinal microbiomeintestinal morphologyoffspringsow

Identifiers

PMID40650586
PMCPMC12342978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.