Observational studyJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI2025
Motion-Insensitive Flip Angle Modulated Liver Proton Density Fat-Fraction and R2* Mapping During Free-Breathing MRI in a Clinical Setting.
Observational study in Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Respiratory Motion Management in Abdominal MRI: Revisiting the Gap Between Technical Advances and Clinical Translation.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Review
- Highly Reproducible, Vendor-Agnostic, Motion-Insensitive Liver PDFF Mapping at 0.55T, 1.5T, and 3T.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Optimized motion-insensitive PDFF mapping of the liver.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Functional, Structural, and AI-Based MRI Analysis: A Comprehensive Review of Recent Advances.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Motion-Insensitive Flip Angle Modulated Liver Proton Density Fat-Fraction and R2* Mapping During Free-Breathing MRI in a Clinical Setting.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBreath-held quantitative three-dimensional chemical-shift-encoded (3D-CSE)-MRI is widely used for liver fat and iron quantification but is limited in patients unable to hold breath. Motion-insensitive two-dimensional flip angle modulated (2D-FAM) acquisitions with short temporal aperture may address this limitation. PURPOSE: To evaluate the performance of 2D-FAM-based CSE-MRI during free-breathing for quantifying proton density fat-fraction (PDFF) and R2*-based liver iron concentration (LIC). STUDY TYPE: Retrospective single-center observational analysis. POPULATION: 230 patients (110 women [47.8%], mean age 51 ± 16 years [standard deviation, SD], range 4-85), undergoing routine clinical care between January and August 2024. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 1.5-T and 3.0-T, comparison of 2D-FAM-CSE-MRI under free-breathing and breath-held 3D-CSE-MRI. ASSESSMENT: Three radiologists evaluated image quality, apparent signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and motion artifacts on a 5-point scale. PDFF and R2*-based LIC were measured in each liver segment from each acquisition. Agreement of PDFF and LIC between techniques was assessed, comparing body mass index (BMI) groups (< 30 and ≥ 30 kg/m STATISTICAL TESTS: Inter-rater reliability with intra-class coefficient (ICC). Bias and limits of agreement (LoA) using Bland-Altman analysis. Linear regression assessed correlations of PDFF and LIC. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (AUC) to assess diagnostic performance. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05 (Bonferroni-corrected p < 0.01 for patient characteristics).
results2D-FAM demonstrated superior image quality (median rating 4 vs. 3) and fewer motion artifacts (median rating 4 vs. 3) than 3D-CSE-MRI in PDFF and R2* maps. Inter-rater reliability was good to excellent (ICC 0.77-0.92). PDFF agreement was excellent (bias: +0.32%, LoA [-1.37,2.00] for BMI < 30 kg/m DATA
conclusion2D-FAM CSE-MRI enables motion-insensitive liver fat and iron quantification that can be performed during free-breathing. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 2. TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.