ArticleMolecular ecology2025
Genetic Recovery of Two Wild Seatrout Populations Following Long-Term Stocking With Non-Native Conspecifics.
Article in Molecular ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Modelling the impacts of imports and non-native subspecies hybridisation in honeybees.Heredity · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Predicting the long-term impact of releases and introgression from non-native strains into wild populations remains an important conservation issue, particularly in fishes where stocking and aquaculture escapes have led to widespread genetic admixture between wild and cultured conspecifics. Here, we investigated the genetic response of two wild sea trout, Salmo trutta L., populations following long-term stocking programmes with non-native conspecifics. This included temporal sampling spanning 23 years and genome-wide SNP data from two neighbouring Danish rivers that from the 1970's to 1990's were heavily stocked with partially domesticated, non-local hatchery strains. To estimate wild-hatchery admixture we analysed 3656 SNPs in 195 wild-caught fish, 74 hatchery strain fish, and expanded collections temporally by analysing a subset 288 SNPs in 489 additional fish. Admixture estimates decreased from 46% to 62% input from the stocked strains to 25% seven generations after the last stocking. Introgression varied across the genome, indicative of selection for and against specific hatchery gene variants under wild conditions. For the first time in trout, strong temporal allele frequency changes were observed in a gene region harbouring the maturation gene six6 likely associated with divergent selection on age-at-maturity under hatchery versus wild conditions. The two populations showed low overlap between SNPs identified as under negative (or purifying) selection. Results point to selection against hatchery fish and partial recovery of both populations but also emphasise the role of local dynamics in shaping genetic responses to anthropogenic pressure and support the notion that introgression is likely to incur long-lasting changes to the genetic make-up of wild populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.