Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40650492›Full record

ArticleClinical trials (London, England)2025

Seamless monotherapy-combination phase I dose-escalation model-based design.

Libby Daniells, Thomas Jaki, Alimu Dayimu, Nikos Demiris, Basu Bristi, Stefan Symeonides, Pavel Mozgunov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical trials (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Libby DaniellsMRC Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4128-5965
Thomas JakiMRC Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Alimu DayimuClinical Trials Unit, Cancer Theme, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9998-7463
Nikos DemirisClinical Trials Unit, Cancer Theme, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Basu BristiClinical Trials Unit, Cancer Theme, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Stefan SymeonidesEdinburgh Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9892-9314
Pavel MozgunovMRC Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6810-0284

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00040/03Medical Research Council NIHR300576
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phase I dose-escalation studies for a single-agent and combination of anti-cancer agents have explored various model-based designs to guide identification of a maximum tolerated dose and recommended phase II dose. This work describes a parallel approach to dose escalation to expedite identification of maximum tolerated doses both for an anti-cancer agent as monotherapy and in combination with another agent. We develop a three-parameter Bayesian logistic regression model that allows for more efficient use of information between monotherapy and combination parts of the study. The model allows the monotherapy and combination data to drive dose escalation of the combination of treatments, reflecting the known dose-toxicity relationship between the monotherapy and combination setting. Through a thorough simulation study in which the proposed model is compared to two comparative approaches, the three-parameter Bayesian logistic regression model is shown to accurately select doses in the target toxicity interval, performing similar to comparative approaches in terms of proportion of target dose/combination selection, while more than halving the proportion of doses selected that were greater than the target toxicity, thereby improving safety concerns.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsClinical Trials, Phase I as TopicNeoplasmsResearch DesignBayes TheoremComputer SimulationDose-Response Relationship, DrugHumansLogistic ModelsMaximum Tolerated DoseAntineoplastic Agentscombination studyDose-finding

Identifiers

PMID40650492
PMCPMC12318161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.