ArticleMycoses2025
ESCMID-EFISG Survey on Diagnostic and Therapeutic Capacity for Invasive Fungal Infections in Belgium, the Netherlands, and Luxembourg: A Focus on High Azole Resistance.
Article in Mycoses, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis in Non-Neutropenic Patients: An Evolving Clinical Paradigm.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionInvasive fungal infections (IFI) are a major clinical challenge, particularly in immunocompromised patients, and are associated with high morbidity and mortality. With the increasing prevalence of immunosuppressive conditions and ageing populations, the incidence of IFI is rising globally.
objectiveThis survey aims to evaluate the diagnostic and therapeutic capacities for IFI in Belgium, the Netherlands, and Luxembourg (Benelux), a region of high azole-resistance among Aspergillus fumigatus isolates.
methodsA survey evaluating the diagnostic and therapeutic capacity for IFI was conducted in the Benelux. Data were collected from specialists via an online case report form between March and September 2023. The survey addressed patient characteristics, access to microbiology labs, diagnostic methods (microscopy, culture, molecular diagnostics, etc.), IFI incidence, and the availability of antifungal drugs and therapeutic drug monitoring.
resultsIn total, 32 hospitals responded to the questionnaire (12 [38%] from the Netherlands, 19 [59%] from Belgium and one [3%] from Luxembourg). Antifungal susceptibility tests were available in 29 institutions (91%), constituting 84% of the centres in Belgium and 100% for the Netherlands (p = 0.265). Aspergillus PCR testing was available in 12 centres in Belgium (63%) while in 11 centres in the Netherlands (92%, p = 0.108). Mucorales PCR testing was available in 56% of centres. Treatment with at least one amphotericin B formulation was only available in 84% of the responding centres. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), although recommended, was possible for voriconazole in 26 centres (81%) while for posaconazole in 24 centres (75%). Significantly more testing (diagnostic tests and TDM) was outsourced in Belgium compared to the Netherlands (p < 0.001).
conclusionsAntifungal susceptibility testing is widely available in Belgium and the Netherlands, but implementation in areas with high azole resistance for Aspergillus fumigatus is not yet universal, and techniques vary. Tests for coinfections, like Mucorales PCR, were only available in half of the centres. More testing is outsourced in Belgium, likely due to differences in reference centre organisation, country size, transport, and reimbursement. Delays in diagnosis can impact patient outcomes, so awareness of test availability and transport times is crucial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.