Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40650349›Full record

ArticleJournal of personality2026

How Do People Conceptualize Narcissism and Narcissistic Individuals?

Sarah Smith, Travis Proulx, Geoffrey Haddock

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of personality, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. What Narcissists Look Like and Why It's Important.Personality & social psychology bulletin · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sarah SmithSchool of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8954-8854
Travis ProulxSchool of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3763-3138
Geoffrey HaddockSchool of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5293-2772

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAlthough past decades have seen notable advances in the conceptualization and assessment of narcissism, scholarship examining lay conceptualizations of the construct remains limited.

methodWe report two studies utilizing bottom-up, participant-driven methodologies to examine public understandings of narcissism and narcissistic individuals. In Study 1 (n = 202), we thematically analyzed layperson definitions of narcissism and compared their central contents with widely used narcissism measures. In Study 2 (n = 640), participants freely listed terms they associated with narcissistic or selfless acquaintances and rated them on a series of interpersonal dimensions (e.g., attributes, personal values).

resultsStudy 1 found that narcissism is most commonly conceptualized in relation to selfishness and vanity, and that divergences exist between public conceptualizations of narcissism and how it is operationalized in research. Study 2 found that although narcissistic acquaintances are ascribed greater grandiose relative to vulnerable traits (e.g., high extraversion, low agreeableness), they are also judged less favorably and perceived as placing greater (lesser) emphasis on self-enhancement (self-transcendence) values, relative to non-narcissistic acquaintances.

conclusionThese findings broaden our knowledge of lay perspectives of narcissism and offer important theoretical (e.g., conceptualizations of narcissism) and practical implications (e.g., improving public communications regarding narcissism).

Indexed as

Interpersonal RelationsNarcissismPersonalitySelf ConceptAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adultindividual differenceslay perceptionsnarcissismthematic analysis

Identifiers

PMID40650349
PMCPMC13163632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.