ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Recent Advances in the Electrochemical Biosensing of DNA Methylation.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Electrochemical Biosensors for Circulating Tumor Cells and ctDNA: Emerging Strategies for Precision Oncology.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Review
- Transforming Cancer Diagnostics: The Emergence of Liquid Biopsy and Epigenetic Markers.MedComm · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
DNA methylation, as a critical epigenetic modification, plays a central role in gene regulation and has emerged as a powerful biomarker for early disease diagnostics, particularly in cancer. Owing to the limitations of traditional bisulfite sequencing-such as high cost, complexity, and chemical degradation-electrochemical biosensors have gained substantial attention as promising alternatives. This review summarizes recent advancements in electrochemical platforms for bisulfite-free detection of DNA methylation, encompassing direct oxidation strategies, enzyme-assisted recognition (e.g., restriction endonucleases and methyltransferases), immunoaffinity-based methods, and a variety of signal amplification techniques such as rolling circle amplification and catalytic hairpin assembly. Additional approaches, including strand displacement, magnetic enrichment, and adsorption-based detection, are also discussed. These systems demonstrate exceptional sensitivity, often down to the attomolar or femtomolar level, as well as high selectivity, reproducibility, and suitability for real biological matrices. The integration of nanomaterials and redox-active probes further enhances analytical performance. Importantly, many of these biosensing platforms have been validated using clinical samples, reinforcing their translational relevance. The review concludes by outlining current challenges and future directions, emphasizing the potential of electrochemical biosensors as scalable, cost-effective, and minimally invasive tools for real-time epigenetic monitoring and early-stage disease diagnostics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.