ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Limited Myelination Capacity in Human Schwann Cells in Experimental Models in Comparison to Rodent and Porcine Schwann Cells.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Special Issue "Plasticity of the Nervous System After Injury: 2nd Edition".International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Biphasic Electrical Stimulation of Schwann Cells on Conducting Polymer-Coated Carbon Microfibers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Schwann cells (SCs) play a crucial role in peripheral nerve repair by supporting axonal regeneration and remyelination. While extensive research has been conducted using rodent SCs, increasing attention is being directed toward human SCs due to species-specific differences in phenotypical and functional properties, and accessibility of human SCs derived from diverse sources. A major challenge in translating SC-based therapies for nerve repair lies in the inability to replicate human SC myelination in vitro, posing a significant obstacle to drug discovery and preclinical research. In this study, we compared the myelination capacity of human, rodent, and porcine SCs in various co-culture conditions, including species-matched and cross-species neuronal environments in a serum-free medium. Our results confirmed that rodent and porcine SCs readily myelinate neurites under standard culture conditions after treatment with ascorbic acid for two weeks, whereas human SCs, at least within the four-week observation period, failed to show myelin staining in all co-cultures. Furthermore, we investigated whether cell culture manipulation impairs human SC myelination by transplanting freshly harvested and predegenerated human nerve segments into NOD-SCID mice for four weeks. Despite supporting host axonal regeneration into the grafts, human SCs exhibited very limited myelination, suggesting an intrinsic species-specific restriction rather than a cell culture-induced defect. These observations suggest fundamental differences between human and rodent SCs and highlight the need for human-specific models and protocols to advance our understanding of SC myelination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.