ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Anticancer Activity of Roburic Acid: In Vitro and In Silico Investigation.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Roburic Acid as a Therapeutic Candidate: Antiproliferative Activity and Secondary Cell Death Response in Colorectal Cancer Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Natural compounds remain a valuable source of anticancer agents due to their structural diversity and multi-targeted mechanisms of action. Roburic acid (RA), a tetracyclic triterpenoid, has been identified as a substance capable of inhibiting key NF-κB and MAPK signaling pathways through direct interaction with TNF-α, as well as preventing the production of inflammatory mediators and cancer progression. In this study, we evaluated the biological activity of RA against a panel of human cancer cell lines-DLD-1, HT-29, and HCT-116 (colorectal), PC-3 (prostate), and BxPC-3 (pancreatic)-as well as two non-malignant lines: WI-38 (fibroblasts) and CCD-841 CoN (colon epithelium). RA exhibited a concentration-dependent inhibitory effect on cancer cell metabolic activity, with colorectal cancer cells showing relatively higher sensitivity, particularly at shorter incubation times. To distinguish between cytotoxic and cytostatic effects, we performed trypan blue exclusion combined with a cell density assessment, clonogenic assay, and BrdU incorporation assay. The results from these complementary assays confirmed that RA acts primarily through an antiproliferative mechanism rather than by inducing cytotoxicity. In addition, NF-κB reporter assays demonstrated that RA attenuates TNF-α-induced transcriptional activation at higher concentrations, supporting its proposed anti-inflammatory properties and potential to modulate pro-tumorigenic signaling. Finally, our in silico studies predicted that RA may interact with proteins such as CAII, CES1, EGFR, and PLA2G2A, implicating it in the modulation of pathways related to proliferation and cell survival. Collectively, these findings suggest that RA may serve as a promising scaffold for the development of future anticancer agents, particularly in the context of colorectal cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.