ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Evaluation of Commercially Available Kits for Parallel DNA and microRNA Isolation Suitable for Epigenetic Analyses from Cell-Free Saliva and Salivary Extracellular Vesicles.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Research progress on the effects of macrophage‑derived exosomes on muscle factors IGF‑1 and FGF‑2 mediating musculoskeletal crosstalk molecular signaling pathway on bone metabolism (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Salivary Proteomics & Gene Expression Analysis: Applications in Orthodontics and Oral Health Care Research-A Pilot Project.Biomarker insights · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Circulating cell-free nucleic acids (NAs), in particular plasma-derived cell-free DNA, have evolved into promising clinical analytes for prenatal diagnostics, cancer analysis, and cancer surveillance and therapy monitoring. Nevertheless, salivary extracellular and extracellular vesicle (EV)-derived DNA and microRNA have recently gained attention as potential non-invasive biomarkers for a variety of diseases, including cancer, cardiovascular, autoimmune, and infectious diseases. Our goal in this study was therefore to evaluate and optimize commercially available approaches for cell-free nucleic acid isolation, focusing specifically on DNA and miRNA present in cell-free saliva or saliva-derived EVs. Along these lines, we investigated various commercially available kits, which enable parallel isolation of cell-free DNA and RNA in separate fractions from cell-free saliva and salivary EVs, respectively, and compared them to single analyte extraction kits. The efficiency of all tested nucleic acid extraction methods was determined by comparing DNA and RNA fluorescence spectroscopy measurements and quantitative PCR values obtained from a selection of different DNA- and microRNA targets. We found the Norgen Plasma/Serum RNA/DNA Purification Mini kit in combination with the miRCURY exosome isolation kit to work best in our hands and to provide the highest yields of EV-derived nucleic acids. Having tested and identified effective protocols for isolating salivary extracellular nucleic acids, we present with this comparison study, among others, a sound basis for future circulating small nucleic acid and epigenetic biomarker research aiming for early disease diagnosis, prognosis, and prediction from cell-free saliva, representing an easy-to-collect and readily available diagnostic fluid.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.