ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Microfluidic Liquid Biopsy Minimally Invasive Cancer Diagnosis by Nano-Plasmonic Label-Free Detection of Extracellular Vesicles: Review.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Plasmonic Nanoarray Biosensors for Non-Invasive Cancer Diagnostics.Biosensors · 2026Review
- Extracellular Vesicles in Cancer: Biomarkers, Mechanisms, and Emerging Diagnostic Technologies.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- Combined multi-omics and multi-spectral profiling of plasma extracellular vesicles reveals liquid biopsy biomarkers for glioma diagnosis.Cell reports. Medicine · 2026Article
- Extracellular vesicle biomarkers: current status and future perspectives as novel tools in liquid biopsy.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Cancer and Aging Biomarkers: Classification, Early Detection Technologies and Emerging Research Trends.Biosensors · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cancer diagnosis requires alternative techniques that allow for early, non-invasive, or minimally invasive identification. Traditional methods, like tissue biopsies, are highly invasive and can be traumatic for patients. Liquid biopsy, a less invasive option, detects cancer biomarkers in body fluids such as blood and urine. However, early-stage cancer often presents low biomarker levels, making sensitivity a challenge for integrating liquid biopsy into early diagnosis. Recent studies revealed that extracellular vesicles (EVs) secreted by cells are apt markers for liquid biopsy. Detecting extracellular vesicles (EVs) for liquid biopsy faces challenges like low sensitivity, EV subtype heterogeneity, and difficulty isolating pure populations. Label-free methods, such as plasmonic biosensors and Raman spectroscopy, offer potential solutions by enabling direct analysis without markers, improving accuracy, and reducing complexity. This review paper discusses current challenges in EV-based liquid biopsy for cancer diagnosis and prognosis. It addresses the effective use of microfluidics and nano-plasmonic approaches to address these challenges. Enhancing label-free EV detection in liquid biopsy could revolutionize early cancer diagnosis by offering non-invasive, cost-effective, and rapid testing. This could improve patient outcomes through personalized treatment and ease the burden on healthcare systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.