Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40650056›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025

Histone Acetylation in Central and Peripheral Nervous System Injuries and Regeneration: Epigenetic Dynamics and Therapeutic Perspectives.

Georgina Palomés-Borrajo, Xavier Navarro, Clara Penas

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Post-Translational Modifications in Traumatic Brain Injury: Decoding the Proteomic Landscape and Molecular Mechanisms of Secondary Injury.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026
    Review
  3. Special Issue "Plasticity of the Nervous System After Injury: 2nd Edition".International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Georgina Palomés-BorrajoInstitute of Neurosciences, Department of Cell Biology, Physiology and Immunology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8217-2054
Xavier NavarroInstitute of Neurosciences, Department of Cell Biology, Physiology and Immunology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9849-902X
Clara PenasInstitute of Neurosciences, Department of Cell Biology, Physiology and Immunology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0554-3832

Funding

Agencia Estatal de Investigación PID2022-140655OB-I00, CPP2022-009550
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traumatic injuries to the peripheral (PNS) and central nervous systems (CNS) trigger distinct regenerative responses, with the PNS displaying limited regenerative capacity and the CNS remaining largely refractory. Recent research highlights the role of epigenetic modifications, particularly histone acetylation, in modulating the gene expression programs that drive axonal regeneration. This review synthesizes current findings on post-translational histone modifications, focusing on histone acetyltransferases (HATs), histone deacetylases (HDACs), and epigenetic readers, in addition to their impact on neuronal and non-neuronal cells following injury. While HATs like p300/CBP and PCAF promote the expression of regeneration-associated genes, HDAC inhibition has been shown to facilitate neurite outgrowth, neuroprotection, and functional recovery in both PNS and CNS models. However, HDAC3, HDAC5, and HDAC6 demonstrate context- and cell-type-specific roles in both promoting and limiting regenerative processes. The review also highlights cell-specific findings that have been scarcely covered in the previous literature. Thus, the immunomodulatory roles of epigenetic regulators in microglia and macrophages, their involvement in remyelination via Schwann cells and oligodendrocytes, and their impact on astrocyte function are within the scope of this review. Closely considering cell-context specificity is critical, as some targets can exert opposite effects depending on the cell type involved. This represents a major challenge for current pharmacological therapies, which often lack precision. This complexity underscores the need to develop strategies that allow for cell-specific delivery or target regulators with converging beneficial effects across cell types. Such approaches may enhance regenerative outcomes after CNS or PNS injury.

Indexed as

Central Nervous SystemEpigenesis, GeneticHistonesNerve RegenerationPeripheral Nerve InjuriesPeripheral Nervous SystemAcetylationAnimalsHistone AcetyltransferasesHistone DeacetylasesHumansProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalHistone AcetyltransferasesHistone DeacetylasesHistonesepigeneticshistone acetylationregeneration

Identifiers

PMID40650056
PMCPMC12250607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.