SynthesisInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Porcine Small Intestinal Submucosa Extracellular Matrix: A Meta-Analysis of Composition, Processing Techniques, and Biomedical Applications.
Synthesis in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Matrix-Bound Nanovesicles as Tissue-Specific Signaling Hubs for Immunomodulation and Precision Regenerative Medicine.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Benchmarking of Decellularization Protocols for Small Intestinal Submucosa: Defining the Gold Standard for Functional Tissue Engineering.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Nerve Guidance Conduit Prepared from Decellularized Small Intestine for Nerve Repair.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Porcine small intestinal submucosa (SIS) extracellular matrix (ECM) has emerged as a widely researched biological scaffold in regenerative medicine. This meta-analysis examines 205 peer-reviewed studies published from 1993 to 2025, emphasizing the biochemical composition, decellularization techniques, biomedical applications, and validation methods associated with SIS-ECM. Findings reveal a dominant focus on wound healing and cardiovascular repair, reflecting the scaffold's mechanical adaptability and bioactivity. Research has evolved from basic compositional analyses to complex, application-specific investigations that incorporate in vivo models and functional outcome measures. Decellularization methods vary significantly, trending toward hybrid, multi-step protocols that preserve ECM integrity while ensuring cellular clearance. While the results are encouraging, a notable transparency issue persists, with only a third of studies providing full methodological details, which restricts reproducibility. Frequently utilized validation methods encompass mechanical testing, histology, DNA quantification, and growth factor retention. This review emphasizes the critical requirement for standardized guidelines in preparation and reporting to guarantee the safe and effective clinical application of SIS-ECM. Through continuous refinement and collaboration among various disciplines, SIS-ECM has the potential to serve as a next-generation scaffold for a range of regenerative uses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.