Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40649770›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025

Total Antioxidant Capacity of

Julie Marshall, Lissa Gilliam, Melanie McGilton, Ana Patty, Lily Sowell, Ashley Cherry, Brian Fisher, Matt Scholten, Chris Liebold, Darlene Cowart and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Julie MarshallLubbock Christian University, 5601 19th ST, Lubbock, TX 79407, USA.ORCID 0009-0000-9260-0932
Lissa GilliamLubbock Christian University, 5601 19th ST, Lubbock, TX 79407, USA.
Melanie McGiltonLubbock Christian University, 5601 19th ST, Lubbock, TX 79407, USA.
Ana PattyLubbock Christian University, 5601 19th ST, Lubbock, TX 79407, USA.
Lily SowellLubbock Christian University, 5601 19th ST, Lubbock, TX 79407, USA.ORCID 0009-0009-8365-6200
Ashley CherryLubbock Christian University, 5601 19th ST, Lubbock, TX 79407, USA.
Brian FisherLubbock Christian University, 5601 19th ST, Lubbock, TX 79407, USA.
Matt ScholtenThe J.M. Smucker Co., Orrville, OH 444667, USA.
Chris LieboldThe J.M. Smucker Co., Orrville, OH 444667, USA.
Darlene CowartBirdsong Peanuts, Suffolk, VA 23434, USA.
Samara SterlingThe Peanut Institute, Albany, GA 31708, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antioxidants are critical components of the body's defense system, providing protection against cell-damaging free radicals responsible for oxidative damage of biomolecules. Humans benefit from the consumption of plants with high antioxidant content, which have been shown to positively impact health. In plant physiology, antioxidants provide protection from biotic and abiotic stress, particularly during the development of seeds and germination. Peanut seeds and seed coats have been shown to contain several beneficial antioxidants and are a good source of phytonutrients. Seed coat color can vary greatly and impact the antioxidant capacity of the edible portion of the peanut. Additionally, the seed coat can provide bitter notes in products, affecting their palatability and potentially negating the beneficial properties of the antioxidants present. A total of 42 accessions from the Germplasm Resource Information Network (GRIN) with a variety of seed coat colors were obtained and analyzed for total antioxidant capacity to provide a baseline assessment of the distribution of antioxidants in kernel versus seed coats. The results demonstrated that seed coat color somewhat impacts antioxidant capacity, and 56-88% of the total antioxidant capacity resides in the seed kernel. Three control samples, not part of the germplasm collection, were roasted and prepared for analysis by the descriptive sensory panel. Seed coats were added back to the roasted paste in increasing proportion for analysis by the panel, and perceptions regarding bitterness and overall organoleptic properties were noted. Based on the results of this study, several accessions were selected and then planted for increase and potential crossbreeding with appropriate commercial cultivars. This information could be used to selectively add antioxidant capacity to peanut breeding programs to provide additional health benefits to consumers without compromising the sensory perception and desirability and peanut products in nutrition.

Indexed as

AntioxidantsArachisSeedsHumansTasteAntioxidantscatechinsflavonoidspeanut flavorphenolic acidsstilbenes

Identifiers

PMID40649770
PMCPMC12250297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.