Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40649744›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025

Influenza a Virus Inhibition: Evaluating Computationally Identified Cyproheptadine Through In Vitro Assessment.

Sanja Glisic, Kristina Stevanovic, Andrej Perdih, Natalya Bukreyeva, Junki Maruyama, Vladimir Perovic, Sergi López-Serrano, Ayub Darji, Draginja Radosevic, Milan Sencanski and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Sanja GlisicLaboratory for Bioinformatics and Computational Chemistry, Institute of Nuclear Sciences VINCA, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0001-5691-1055
Kristina StevanovicLaboratory for Bioinformatics and Computational Chemistry, Institute of Nuclear Sciences VINCA, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID 0009-0002-7066-426X
Andrej PerdihTheory Department, National Institute of Chemistry, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0002-6645-9231
Natalya BukreyevaDepartment of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77555, USA.
Junki MaruyamaDepartment of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77555, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0088-4793
Vladimir PerovicLaboratory for Bioinformatics and Computational Chemistry, Institute of Nuclear Sciences VINCA, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0002-3700-6452
Sergi López-SerranoInfection Biology Laboratory, Department of Medicine and Life Sciences (MELIS), Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona Biomedical Research Park (PRBB), 08003 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0968-7713
Ayub DarjiInstitut de Recerca en Tecnologies Agroalimentaries (IRTA), Centre de Recerca en Sanitat Animal (CReSA, IRTA-UAB), Campus de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain.
Draginja RadosevicLaboratory for Bioinformatics and Computational Chemistry, Institute of Nuclear Sciences VINCA, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.
Milan SencanskiLaboratory for Bioinformatics and Computational Chemistry, Institute of Nuclear Sciences VINCA, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0002-7296-3223
Veljko VeljkovicBiomed Protection, Galveston, TX 77550, USA.
Bruno BottaDepartment of Chemistry and Technologies of Drugs, Sapienza University of Roma, 00185 Roma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8707-4333
Mattia MoriDepartment of Biotechnology, Chemistry and Pharmacy, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2398-1254
Slobodan PaesslerDepartment of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77555, USA.

Funding

Ministry of Science, Technological Development and Innovation of the Republic of Serbia 451-03-136/2025-03/ 200017NextGeneration EU-MUR PNRR Extended Partnership initiative on Emerging Infectious Diseas-es PE00000007, INF-ACT
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Influenza is still a chronic global health threat, inducing a sustained search for effective antiviral therapeutics. Computational methods have played a pivotal role in developing small molecule therapeutics. In this study, we applied a combined in silico and in vitro approach to explore the potential anti-influenza activity of cyproheptadine, a clinically used histamine H1 receptor antagonist. Virtual screening based on the average quasivalence number (AQVN) and electron-ion interaction potential (EIIP) descriptors suggests similarities between cyproheptadine and several established anti-influenza agents. The subsequent ligand-based pharmacophore screening of a focused H1 antagonist library was aligned with the bioinformatics prediction, and further experimental in vitro evaluation of cyproheptadine demonstrated its anti-influenza activity. These findings provide proof of concept for cyproheptadine's in silico-predicted antiviral potential and underscore the value of integrating computational predictions with experimental validation. The results of the current study provide a preliminary proof of concept for the predicted anti-influenza potential based on computational analysis and emphasize the utility of integrating in silico screening with experimental validation in the early stages of drug repurposing efforts.

Indexed as

Antiviral AgentsCyproheptadineInfluenza A virusAnimalsComputational BiologyComputer SimulationDogsHumansInfluenza, HumanMolecular Docking SimulationAntiviral AgentsCyproheptadineantiviralcyproheptadinedrug resistanceinfluenzavirtual screening

Identifiers

PMID40649744
PMCPMC12249625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.