ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Research on the Pavement Performance of Slag/Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer-Stabilized Soil.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Formation of the Structure and Properties of Building Ceramics Based on Coal Ash and Metallurgical Slags: A Review of Modern Research.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Optimization of Mix Proportion and Performance Study of Metakaolin-Slag Geopolymer Mortar Based on Orthogonal Experiment.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Application of FA-CGP-GGBS Geopolymers as Cement Substitute in Crushed Stone Base.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Research on the Pavement Performance of Slag/Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer-Stabilized Soil.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Study on preparation and performance of cement-stabilized macadam containing ground sludge gasification slag (GSGS).RSC advances · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The road construction sector urgently requires environmentally friendly, low-carbon, and high-performance base materials. Traditional materials exhibit issues of high energy consumption and carbon emissions, making it difficult for them to align with sustainable development requirements. While slag- and fly ash-based geopolymers demonstrate promising application potential in civil engineering, research on their application in road-stabilized soils remains insufficient. To address the high energy consumption and carbon emissions associated with conventional road base materials and to fill this research gap, this study investigated the utilization of industrial solid wastes through slag-based geopolymer and fly ash as stabilizers, systematically evaluating the pavement performance of two distinct soil types. Unconfined compressive strength tests and freeze-thaw cycling tests were conducted to elucidate the effects of stabilizer dosage, fly ash co-stabilization, and compaction degree on mechanical properties. The results demonstrated that the compressive strength of both stabilized soils increased significantly with higher slag-based geopolymer content, achieving peak values of 5.2 MPa (soil sample 1) and 4.5 MPa (soil sample 2), representing a 30% improvement over cement-stabilized soils with identical mix proportions. Fly ash co-stabilization exhibited more pronounced reinforcement effects on soil sample 2. At a 98% compaction degree, soil sample 1 maintained a stable 50% strength enhancement, whereas soil sample 2 displayed a dose-dependent exponential strength increase. Freeze-thaw resistance tests revealed the superior performance of soil sample 1, showing a loss of compressive strength (BDR) of 78% with 8% geopolymer stabilization alone, which improved to 90% after fly ash co-stabilization. For soil sample 2, the BDR increased from 64% to 80% through composite stabilization. This study confirms that slag/fly ash-based geopolymer-stabilized soils not only meet the strength requirements for heavy-traffic subbases and light-traffic base courses, but also demonstrates its great potential as a low-carbon and environmentally friendly material to replace traditional road base materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.