Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40649661›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Research on the Pavement Performance of Slag/Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer-Stabilized Soil.

Chenyang Yang, Yan Jiang, Zhiyun Li, Yibin Huang, Jinchao Yue

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chenyang YangSchool of Water Conservancy and Transportation, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China.
Yan JiangSchool of Water Conservancy and Transportation, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China.
Zhiyun LiGeotechnical Engineering Research Institute, Guangdong Research Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower, Guangzhou 510610, China.
Yibin HuangSchool of Water Conservancy and Transportation, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China.
Jinchao YueSchool of Water Conservancy and Transportation, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China.

Funding

Guangdong Provincial Science and Technology Program XJLY-2022HT-62
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The road construction sector urgently requires environmentally friendly, low-carbon, and high-performance base materials. Traditional materials exhibit issues of high energy consumption and carbon emissions, making it difficult for them to align with sustainable development requirements. While slag- and fly ash-based geopolymers demonstrate promising application potential in civil engineering, research on their application in road-stabilized soils remains insufficient. To address the high energy consumption and carbon emissions associated with conventional road base materials and to fill this research gap, this study investigated the utilization of industrial solid wastes through slag-based geopolymer and fly ash as stabilizers, systematically evaluating the pavement performance of two distinct soil types. Unconfined compressive strength tests and freeze-thaw cycling tests were conducted to elucidate the effects of stabilizer dosage, fly ash co-stabilization, and compaction degree on mechanical properties. The results demonstrated that the compressive strength of both stabilized soils increased significantly with higher slag-based geopolymer content, achieving peak values of 5.2 MPa (soil sample 1) and 4.5 MPa (soil sample 2), representing a 30% improvement over cement-stabilized soils with identical mix proportions. Fly ash co-stabilization exhibited more pronounced reinforcement effects on soil sample 2. At a 98% compaction degree, soil sample 1 maintained a stable 50% strength enhancement, whereas soil sample 2 displayed a dose-dependent exponential strength increase. Freeze-thaw resistance tests revealed the superior performance of soil sample 1, showing a loss of compressive strength (BDR) of 78% with 8% geopolymer stabilization alone, which improved to 90% after fly ash co-stabilization. For soil sample 2, the BDR increased from 64% to 80% through composite stabilization. This study confirms that slag/fly ash-based geopolymer-stabilized soils not only meet the strength requirements for heavy-traffic subbases and light-traffic base courses, but also demonstrates its great potential as a low-carbon and environmentally friendly material to replace traditional road base materials.

Indexed as

compressive strengthfly ashfreeze–thaw resistancepavement performancesemi-rigid baseslag-based geopolymerstabilized soil

Identifiers

PMID40649661
PMCPMC12251318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.