ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Numerical Analysis of Cement Placement into Drilling Fluid in Oilwell Applications.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding the displacement mechanism of cement slurry in drilling fluid is crucial for enhancing the safety of oil well cementing and mitigating geotechnical risks. This study investigated the oil well cementing process by simulating the displacement of drilling fluid by cement slurry in the annular space between the well casing and the surrounding formations using computational fluid dynamics (CFD). The volume-of-fluid (VOF) method in ANSYS-Fluent was employed to track the interfaces between drilling fluid, spacer fluid, and cement slurry. The study simulated fluid motion during drilling operations in the oil and gas industry, considering both smooth and irregular annular geometries around wells. The results show that the efficiency of cement slurry in displacing drilling fluid is higher in Case-2 (irregular outer walls) than in Case-1 (smooth outer walls). Under various inlet velocity conditions in Case-2, an optimal filling rate was achieved at an inlet velocity of 0.5 m/s. When the inlet velocity of the cement slurry was 0.2 m/s, a higher cement content was observed compared to 0.05 m/s, although some recirculation regions were more likely to form at this velocity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.