Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40649559›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Relations Between the Printability Descriptors of Mortar and NMR Relaxometry Data.

Mihai M Rusu, Ioan Ardelean

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mihai M RusuDepartment of Physics and Chemistry, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, 400114 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-6760-7320
Ioan ArdeleanDepartment of Physics and Chemistry, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, 400114 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-8082-6600

Funding

Unitatea Executiva Pentru Finantarea Invatamantului Superior a Cercetarii Dezvoltarii si Inovarii ERANET-M3-STF4SWUnitatea Executiva Pentru Finantarea Invatamantului Superior a Cercetarii Dezvoltarii si Inovarii Project Number 27/01-07-2024, within program GCNAC ARUT 2023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Concrete printing technologies play a key role in the modernization of construction practices. One factor that mitigates their progress is the development of standards and characterization tools for concrete during printing. The aim of this work is to point out correlations between some printability descriptors of mortars and the data obtained from low-field nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) relaxometry techniques. In this context, the superposed effects of an acrylic-based superplasticizer and calcium nitrate accelerator were investigated. The mortars under study are based on white Portland cement, fine aggregates, and silica fume at fixed ratios. Extrusion tests and visual inspection of the filaments evaluate the extrudability and the printing window. The selected compositions were also investigated via transverse T2 and longitudinal T1 NMR relaxation times. The results indicate that both additives increase the printing window of the mortar, while the accelerator induces a faster increase in specific surface area of capillary pores S/V only after 30-60 min of hydration. Some correlations were found between the printing window and the range where the transverse relaxation rates 1/T2 and the pore surface-to-volume ratios S/V increase linearly. This suggests some promising connections between NMR techniques and the study of structural buildup of cementitious materials.

Indexed as

acceleratorconcrete printingextrusionNMR relaxometryopen timestructural buildupsuperplasticizertest methods

Identifiers

PMID40649559
PMCPMC12251319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.