ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Dynamic Strength Prediction of Brittle Engineering Materials via Stacked Multi-Model Ensemble Learning and Interpretability-Driven Feature Analysis.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Dynamic Ensemble Learning with Transfer Learning for Fatigue Performance Prediction in Ni-Based Superalloys.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- An Integrated NLP-ML Framework for Property Prediction and Design of Steels.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate prediction of the dynamic compressive strength of brittle engineering materials is of significant theoretical and engineering importance for underground engineering design, safety assessment, and dynamic hazard prevention. To enhance prediction accuracy and model interpretability, this study proposes a novel framework integrating stacking ensemble learning with SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) for dynamic strength prediction. Leveraging multidimensional input variables, including static strength, strain rate, P-wave velocity, bulk density, and specimen geometry parameters, we constructed six machine learning regression models: K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT), LightGBM, XGBoost, and Multilayer Perceptron Neural Network (MLPNN). Through comparative performance evaluation, optimal base models were selected for stacking ensemble training. Results demonstrate that the proposed stacking model outperforms individual models in prediction accuracy, stability, and generalization capability. Further SHAP-based interpretability analysis reveals that strain rate dominates the prediction outcomes, with its SHAP values exhibiting a characteristic nonlinear response trend. Additionally, structural and mechanical variables such as static strength, P-wave velocity, and bulk density demonstrate significant positive contributions to model outputs. This framework provides a robust tool for intelligent prediction and mechanistic interpretation of the dynamic strength of brittle materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.