ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Modeling and Cutting Mechanics in the Milling of Polymer Matrix Composites.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The study investigates the problem of modeling cutting-force components through response surface methodology and reports the results of an investigation into the impact of machining parameters on the cutting mechanics of polymer-matrix composites. The novelty of this study is the modeling of cutting forces and the determination of mathematical models of these forces. The models describe the values of forces as a function of the milling parameters. In addition, the cutting resistance of the composites was determined. The influence of the material and rake angle of individual tools on the cutting force components was also determined. Measurements of the main (tangential) cutting force showed that, using large rake angles for uncoated carbide tools, one could obtain maximum force values that were similar to those obtained with polycrystalline diamond tools with a small rake angle. The results of the analysis of the tangential component of cutting resistance showed that, regardless of the rake angle, the values range from 140 N to 180 N. An analysis of the feed component of cutting resistance showed that the maximum values of this force ranged from 46 N to 133 N. The results showed that the highest values of the feed component of cutting resistance occurred during the machining of polymer composites with carbon fibers and that they were most affected by feed per tooth. It was also shown that the force models determined during milling with diamond insert tools had the highest coefficient of determination in the range of 0.90-0.99. The cutting resistance analysis showed that the values tested are in the range of 3.8 N/mm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.