Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40649501›Full record

ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Recycled Aggregates for Sustainable Construction: Strengthening Strategies and Emerging Frontiers.

Ying Peng, Shenruowen Cai, Yutao Huang, Xue-Fei Chen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ying PengSchool of Civil Engineering, Putian University, Putian 351100, China.
Shenruowen CaiSchool of Civil Engineering, Putian University, Putian 351100, China.
Yutao HuangSchool of Civil Engineering, Putian University, Putian 351100, China.
Xue-Fei ChenSchool of Civil Engineering, Putian University, Putian 351100, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4328-4088

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The transformative trajectory of urban development in the contemporary era has engendered a substantial escalation in construction waste generation, particularly in China, where it constitutes approximately 40% of the total solid waste stream. Traditional landfill disposal methodologies pose formidable ecological challenges, encompassing soil contamination, groundwater pollution, and significant greenhouse gas emissions. Furthermore, the unsustainable exploitation of natural sandstone resources undermines energy security and disrupts ecological balance. In response to these pressing issues, an array of scholars and researchers have embarked on an exploratory endeavor to devise innovative strategies for the valorization of construction waste. Among these strategies, the conversion of waste into recycled aggregates has emerged as a particularly promising pathway. However, the practical deployment of recycled aggregates within the construction industry is impeded by their inherent physico-mechanical properties, such as heightened water absorption capacity and diminished compressive strength. To surmount these obstacles, a multitude of enhancement techniques, spanning physical, chemical, and thermal treatments, have been devised and refined. This paper undertakes a comprehensive examination of the historical evolution, recycling methodologies, and enhancement strategies pertinent to recycled aggregates. It critically evaluates the efficacy, cost-benefit analyses, and environmental ramifications of these techniques, while elucidating the microstructural and physicochemical disparities between recycled and natural aggregates. Furthermore, it identifies pivotal research gaps and prospective avenues for future inquiry, underscoring the imperative for collaborative endeavors aimed at developing cost-effective and environmentally benign enhancement techniques that adhere to the stringent standards of contemporary construction practices, thereby addressing the intertwined challenges of waste management and resource scarcity.

Indexed as

concreteconstruction wastesrecycled aggregatessustainable urban developmentwaste valorization

Identifiers

PMID40649501
PMCPMC12250914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.