ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
An Experimental Investigation on the Mechanical Performance of Engineered Cementitious Composites with Different Types of Steel Fibers.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Advanced Development in Concrete Materials.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Engineered cementitious composites (ECCs), known for their superior ductility and strain-hardening behavior compared to conventional concrete, have been predominantly studied with polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) fibers. However, the potential economic and technical advantages of incorporating steel fibers into ECCs have been largely overlooked in the literature. This study investigates the mechanical performance of ECC reinforced with different types of steel fibers, including straight, twisted, hooked, and hybrid fibers of different lengths, as compared to PVA. The inclusion of various supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) such as slag and fly ash with each type of steel fiber was also considered at a constant fiber volume fraction of 2%. The mechanical properties were assessed through compressive strength, splitting tensile strength, and four-point flexural tests along with calculations of toughness, ductility, and energy absorption capacity indices. This study compares the mechanical properties of different ECC compositions, revealing that ECCs with hybrid steel fibers (short and long) achieved more than twice the tensile strength, 12.7% higher toughness, and 36.4% greater energy absorption capacity compared to ECCs with PVA fibers, while exhibiting similar multiple micro-cracking behavior at failure. The findings highlight the importance of fiber type and distribution in enhancing an ECC's mechanical properties, providing valuable insights for developing more cost-effective and resilient construction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.