Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40649476›Full record

ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Critical Pathways for Transforming the Energy Future: A Review of Innovations and Challenges in Spent Lithium Battery Recycling Technologies.

Zhiyong Lu, Liangmin Ning, Xiangnan Zhu, Hao Yu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zhiyong LuCollege of Energy and Mining Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China.ORCID 0009-0006-2052-6722
Liangmin NingCollege of Energy Storage Technology, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6256-1696
Xiangnan ZhuCollege of Energy and Mining Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China.
Hao YuCollege of Energy Storage Technology, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China.

Funding

China Postdoctoral Science Foundation 2023M742142National Natural Science Foundation of China 52204273Taishan Scholars Program of Shandong Province, and Project of Shandong Province Higher Educational Youth Innovation Science and Technology Program 2023KJ084
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the wake of global energy transition and the "dual-carbon" goal, the rapid growth of electric vehicles has posed challenges for large-scale lithium-ion battery decommissioning. Retired batteries exhibit dual attributes of strategic resources (cobalt/lithium concentrations several times higher than natural ores) and environmental risks (heavy metal pollution, electrolyte toxicity). This paper systematically reviews pyrometallurgical and hydrometallurgical recovery technologies, identifying bottlenecks: high energy/lithium loss in pyrometallurgy, and corrosion/cost/solvent regeneration issues in hydrometallurgy. To address these, an integrated recycling process is proposed: low-temperature physical separation (liquid nitrogen embrittlement grinding + froth flotation) for cathode-anode separation, mild roasting to convert lithium into water-soluble compounds for efficient metal oxide separation, stepwise alkaline precipitation for high-purity lithium salts, and co-precipitation synthesis of spherical hydroxide precursors followed by segmented sintering to regenerate LiNi

Indexed as

advanced recycling technologygreen leachingmaterial regenerationresource sustainabilityretired lithium-ion batteries

Identifiers

PMID40649476
PMCPMC12250944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.