ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Evaluating Parameter Value Identification Methods for Modeling of Nonlinear Stress Relaxation in Polyethylene.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Viscous properties play a major role in the time-dependent deformation behavior of polymers and have long been characterized using spring-dashpot models. However, such models face a bottleneck of having multiple sets of model parameter values that can all be used to simulate the same deformation behavior. As a result, these model parameters have not been widely used to quantify the viscous properties. In this study, a newly developed multi-relaxation-recovery test was used to obtain the variation in stress response to deformation of polyethylene (PE) and its pipes during relaxation, revealing the complexity of PE's nonlinear viscous stress response to deformation. Using a three-branch spring-dashpot model with two Eyring's dashpots, this study shows the possibility of determining the model parameter values using four different analysis methods, namely, the mode method, peak-point method, highest-frequency method, and best-five-fits method. Model parameter values from these methods are compared and discussed in this paper, to reach the conclusion that the best-five-fits method provides the most reliable and relatively unique set of model parameter values for characterizing the mechanical performance of PE and its pipes. The best-five-fits method is expected to enable the use of the model parameters to quantify PE's viscous properties so that PE's load-carrying performance can be properly characterized, even for long-term applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.