Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40649446›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Finite Element Simulation of the Laser Shock Peening Process on 304L Stainless Steel.

Mayur B Wakchaure, Manoranjan Misra, Pradeep L Menezes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mayur B WakchaureDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557, USA.
Manoranjan MisraDepartment of Chemical and Materials Engineering, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557, USA.
Pradeep L MenezesDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8030-8504

Funding

United States Department of Energy DoE-NEUP Project No. 20-19641
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates the effects of Laser Shock Peening (LSP) on residual stress distribution and surface deformation using a Finite Element Method (FEM) model. LSP is a surface treatment process that generates compressive residual stress by applying high-energy laser pulses over nanosecond timescales. The study aims to analyze the impact of key parameters, specifically laser spot overlap rate and power density, on the induced residual stress and surface deformation. A Design of Experiment (DOE) approach was used to systematically vary these parameters. These simulations were performed using the ANSYS Explicit Dynamics FEM with a Johnson-Cook material model to capture the nonlinear constitutive behavior. The research analyzes the distribution of residual stress and surface deformation caused by LSP. Increasing laser spot overlap and power density leads to higher compressive residual stress and surface deformation, revealing two distinct behavioral outcomes: either deep compressive stress with minimal deformation or a transition from compressive to tensile stress followed by significant surface deformation and a subsequent return to compressive stress. The results demonstrate strong agreement with existing experimental data presented in the literature. This study contributes novel insights into the interaction between LSP parameters and their effects on material properties, with implications for understanding LSP techniques in practical applications. The triangular pulse model and dual-overlap analysis offer a novel simulation strategy for optimizing LSP parameters in stainless steel.

Indexed as

finite element analysislaser shock peeningresidual stresses

Identifiers

PMID40649446
PMCPMC12250982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.