Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40649427›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Multiscale Geometric Characterization and Discrimination of Dermatoglyphs (Fingerprints) on Hardened Clay-A Novel Archaeological Application of the GelSight Max.

Katarzyna Peta, W James Stemp, Tera Stocking, Richard Chen, George Love, Matthew A Gleason, Brett A Houk, Christopher A Brown

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Katarzyna PetaInstitute of Mechanical Technology, Poznan University of Technology, Pl. Marii Skłodowskiej-Curie 5, 60-965 Poznań, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-9915-838X
W James StempDepartment of Sociology, Anthropology and Criminology, Keene State College, 229 Main Street, Keene, NH 03435-3400, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8063-9327
Tera StockingDepartment of Anthropology, University of Kentucky, 150 Patterson Drive, Lexington, KY 40506-0027, USA.ORCID 0009-0001-1431-2262
Richard ChenSurface Metrology Laboratory, Mechanical and Materials Engineering Department, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, 100 Institute Road, Worcester, MA 01609-2280, USA.ORCID 0009-0004-6352-0625
George LoveSurface Metrology Laboratory, Mechanical and Materials Engineering Department, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, 100 Institute Road, Worcester, MA 01609-2280, USA.ORCID 0009-0002-1373-2473
Matthew A GleasonSurface Metrology Laboratory, Mechanical and Materials Engineering Department, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, 100 Institute Road, Worcester, MA 01609-2280, USA.
Brett A HoukDepartment of Sociology, Anthropology, and Social Work, Texas Tech University, 1101 Boston Ave., #158, Lubbock, TX 79409-1012, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2490-5870
Christopher A BrownSurface Metrology Laboratory, Mechanical and Materials Engineering Department, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, 100 Institute Road, Worcester, MA 01609-2280, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9355-4824

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A relatively new GelSight Max measurement instrument was applied to the microtopographies of experimental hardened clay surfaces, both with and without fingerprint (dermatoglyph) impressions, and the surface of an archaeological pottery handle fragment with a preserved fingerprint (paleodermatoglyph). The experimental clay surfaces were documented in order to determine the instrument's ability to capture these surfaces in three-dimensions by imprinting them onto an elastomeric tactile membrane. Fingerprints on the experimental hardened clay and the archaeological pottery fragment were mathematically documented to test this instrument's ability to capture these impressions. The surface texture measurements of the hardened clay and the pottery fragment were mathematically compared using conventional topographic characterization parameters (height and hybrid), fractal dimensions (Das) with associated coefficients of determination (R

Indexed as

elastomer tactile sensorfingerprintGelSight Maxpotterysurface metrology

Identifiers

PMID40649427
PMCPMC12250993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.