Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40649229›Full record

ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2025

A Review of Recent Progress in Synthetic Polymer Surface Coatings for the Prevention of Biofilm Formation.

Adrienne Shea, Matthew T Bernards

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Adrienne SheaDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844, USA.ORCID 0009-0002-2400-8229
Matthew T BernardsDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5234-1910

Funding

NASA 80NSSC20M0108NASA 80NSSC22M0120NASA 80NSSC22M0240
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial adhesion and the subsequent formation of biofilms and biofouling have significant economic and health impacts across all sectors. They are especially impactful in industrial corrosion, healthcare, food processing, agriculture, and waste and drinking water. Synthetic polymers that resist bacterial adhesion are adaptable to a wide range of applications in all of these fields. While there are many bacteria-resistant polymers, some of the best performing include polyethylene glycol (PEG), poly(oxazoline) (POZ), and zwitterionic polymers, with zwitterionic polymers showing the most promise with reductions in bacteria adhesion up to 99% over controls. This review summarizes the demonstrated bacterial resistance performance of these polymer coatings based on literature published over the last ten years. It also identifies the front runners for preventing bacterial adhesion while providing the critical next steps for widespread adoption of this technology.

Indexed as

BiofilmsCoated Materials, BiocompatiblePolymersBacteriaBacterial AdhesionBiofoulingHumansPolyethylene GlycolsSurface PropertiesCoated Materials, BiocompatiblePolyethylene GlycolsPolymersbacterial adhesionbiofilmbiofoulinghydrogelsnonfoulingPEGpolyampholytespoly(oxazoline)zwitterions

Identifiers

PMID40649229
PMCPMC12250919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.