ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
DSC Perfusion MRI Artefact Reduction Strategies: A Short Overview for Clinicians and Scientific Applications.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact on survival of glioblastoma patients in relation to the imaging of the peri-surgical area: a multi-parametric diffusion MRI, perfusion MRI, and [11C]MET PET study.The British journal of radiology · 2026Article
- Diffuse Midline Gliomas: Clinical, Diagnostic, and Therapeutic Perspectives.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- A Challenging Differential Diagnosis Between Brain Radionecrosis and Recurrent Metastatic Disease, with Temporary Clinical/Radiological Response to Bevacizumab and Later Imaging Suspicious for Oligoprogression.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Comparison of the normalized cerebral blood volume (CBV) between different models and evaluation of the efficacy of gadolinium leakage in evaluating preoperative adult-type gliomas.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Functional, Structural, and AI-Based MRI Analysis: A Comprehensive Review of Recent Advances.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
MRI perfusion is used to diagnose and monitor neurological conditions such as brain tumors, stroke, dementia, and traumatic brain injury. Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast (DSC) is the most widely available quantitative MRI technique for perfusion imaging. Even in its most basic implementation, DSC MRI provides critical hemodynamic metrics like cerebral blood flow (CBF), blood volume (CBV), mean transit time (MTT), and time between the peak of arterial input and residue function (Tmax), through the dynamic tracking of a gadolinium-based contrast agent. Notwithstanding its high clinical importance and widespread use, the reproducibility and diagnostic reliability are impeded by a lack of standardized pre-processing protocols and quality controls. A comprehensive literature review and the authors' aggregated experience identified common DSC MRI artefacts and corresponding pre-processing methods. Pre-processing methods to correct for artefacts were evaluated for their practical applicability and validation status. A consensus on the pre-processing was established by a multidisciplinary team of experts. Acquisition-related artefacts include geometric distortions, slice timing misalignment, and physiological noise. Intrinsic artefacts include motion, B
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.