ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Biologic Therapy in Severe Asthma: A Phenotype-Driven and Targeted Approach.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Small airway dysfunction as a functional barrier to spirometry-defined clinical remission in severe asthma treated with biologic therapies.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2026Article
- Impact of Single-Inhaler Triple Therapy FF/UMEC/VI on Disease Stability in COPD: A Real-World 12-Month Analysis.Pulmonary therapy · 2026Article
- Review
- Severe Eosinophilic Asthma: From Immunopathology to Pharmacological Treatment.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Short-Term Effects of Dupilumab in Eosinophilic COPD.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Tezepelumab in severe asthma: chest computed tomography assessment of airway remodeling and clinical remission.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Molecular Mechanisms Linking Eosinophils to Lung Function Impairment in Respiratory Diseases.Journal of asthma and allergy · 2026Review
- Predictive Factors And Treatments Associated with Clinical Remission in Severe Eosinophilic Asthma.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Review
- A Multi-Compartment Cytological Approach to Severe Asthma Phenotyping: The BRISA Study (Biomedical Research in Severe Asthma).Journal of asthma and allergy · 2026Article
- Unsupervised Phenotyping of Asthma: Integrating Serum Periostin with Clinical and Inflammatory Profiles.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Advances in pulmonary neuroendocrine cells and their cellular interactions in asthma pathogenesis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Asthma is a highly heterogeneous respiratory disease that, in its severe forms, is characterized by persistent symptoms, frequent exacerbations, and a significant impact on patients' quality of life. Despite high-dose inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting bronchodilators, a subset of patients remains uncontrolled, necessitating advanced therapeutic strategies. The advent of biologic therapies has revolutionized the management of severe asthma, offering targeted interventions based on the underlying inflammatory endotypes, primarily T2-high and T2-low. However, selecting the most appropriate biologic remains challenging due to overlapping phenotypic features and the limited availability of validated biomarkers. This narrative review explores the clinical utility of key biomarkers, including blood eosinophils, fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), periostin, and total and specific IgE, in guiding biologic therapy. All the information provided is based on an extensive literature search conducted on PubMed. We also examine the clinical characteristics and comorbidities that influence therapeutic choices. Furthermore, we present a practical decision-making platform, including a clinical table matching phenotypes with biologic agents, such as omalizumab, mepolizumab, benralizumab, dupilumab, and tezepelumab. By integrating biomarker analysis with clinical assessment, based on current guidelines and our extensive real-life experience, we aim to offer a logical framework to help clinicians select the most suitable biologic treatment for patients with uncontrolled severe asthma. Future research should focus on identifying novel biomarkers, refining patient stratification, and evaluating long-term outcomes to further advance precision medicine in the management of severe asthma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.