Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40649088›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025

Latest Evidence on Intravascular Imaging: A Literature Review.

Rafail Koros, Antonios Karanasos, Michail I Papafaklis, Georgia Xygka, Georgios Vasilagkos, Anastasios Apostolos, Fotios Kallinikos, Maria Papageorgiou, Nikoletta-Maria Tampaki, Charikleia-Maria Fotopoulou and 4 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Rafail KorosCardiology Department, University Hospital of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-6890-5127
Antonios KaranasosCardiology Department, University Hospital of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-8052-6739
Michail I PapafaklisCardiology Department, University Hospital of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-5646-0378
Georgia XygkaCardiology Department, University Hospital of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece.
Georgios VasilagkosCardiology Department, University Hospital of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece.
Anastasios ApostolosCardiology Department, University Hospital of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-2616-7952
Fotios KallinikosCardiology Department, University Hospital of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece.
Maria PapageorgiouCardiology Department, University Hospital of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece.
Nikoletta-Maria TampakiCardiology Department, University Hospital of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece.
Charikleia-Maria FotopoulouCardiology Department, University Hospital of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece.ORCID 0009-0004-3586-4340
Eleni LolouCardiology Department, University Hospital of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece.
Georgia GkioniCardiology Department, University Hospital of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece.
Periklis DavlourosCardiology Department, University Hospital of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece.
Grigorios TsigkasCardiology Department, University Hospital of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-2779-0765

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intravascular imaging (IVI) has emerged as a pivotal tool in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), offering superior visualization of coronary anatomy compared with conventional angiography. This literature review synthesizes the latest evidence from randomized trials and meta-analyses published since 2022, assessing the comparative efficacy of IVI modalities-including intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT)-in complex coronary lesions. Multiple landmark trials, such as RENOVATE-COMPLEX PCI, ILUMIEN IV, OCTOBER, and OCTIVUS, demonstrated that IVI-guided PCI significantly improves procedural outcomes, stent optimization, and clinical endpoints such as target-vessel failure, myocardial infarction, and stent thrombosis. OCT was shown to be particularly beneficial in bifurcation and left main interventions, while IVUS consistently improved outcomes in long lesions and complex anatomies. Despite some trials not meeting their primary clinical endpoints, substudy findings and pooled analyses support a shift toward routine IVI use in anatomically complex cases. Consequently, updated guidelines now recommend IVI as a Class I indication in select patient populations. These findings underscore the need for broader clinical adoption and training in IVI techniques to enhance PCI outcomes.

Indexed as

complex coronary lesionsintravascular imagingintravascular ultrasoundoptical coherence tomographypercutaneous coronary interventionstent optimization

Identifiers

PMID40649088
PMCPMC12251142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.