ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Chronic Total Occlusions: Current Approaches, Evidence and Outcomes.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Retrograde Balloon-Assisted Screening Prevents Guidewire Prolapse During Acute-Angle Distal Cap Puncture in RCA CTO.JACC. Case reports · 2026Article
- Endothelial Activation and Stress Index Predicts Poor Coronary Collateral Development in Chronic Total Occlusion.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Article
- Hybrid Strategies for CTO PCI: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Antegrade and Retrograde Techniques.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic total occlusions (CTOs), defined as complete coronary artery blockages persisting for over three months, are frequently encountered in up to 25% of coronary angiograms. Although percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for CTO remains technically challenging, advancements in guidewires, microcatheters, re-entry devices, and intravascular imaging, along with the expertise of specialized operators, have significantly improved procedural success rates, now exceeding 90% in expert centers. While recent evidence, such as the SYNTAX II study, emphasizes the importance of complete revascularization, over half of CTO cases continue to be managed conservatively with optimal medical therapy (OMT), partly due to the limited high-quality randomized evidence supporting revascularization. Observational studies have demonstrated that successful CTO-PCI is associated with improved angina relief, quality of life, left ventricular function, and possibly long-term survival. Extended observational follow-up, such as the Korean and Canadian registries, suggests long-term reductions in cardiac and all-cause mortality with CTO revascularization. However, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have primarily shown symptomatic benefit, with no consistent reduction in major adverse cardiac events (MACE) or mortality, likely due to limited sample sizes, short follow-up, and treatment crossovers. Various strategies, including the hybrid algorithm, guide CTO interventions by balancing antegrade and retrograde techniques based on lesion complexity. Imaging modalities such as coronary CT angiography and intravascular ultrasound play a pivotal role in planning and optimizing these procedures. Future innovations, such as real-time fusion imaging of CCTA with coronary angiography, may enhance lesion visualization and guidewire navigation. While current guidelines recommend CTO-PCI in selected symptomatic patients with demonstrable ischemia or viable myocardium, the decision should be individualized, incorporating anatomical feasibility, comorbidities, patient preferences, and input from a multidisciplinary Heart Team. Looking ahead, adequately powered RCTs with extended follow-up are essential to determine the long-term clinical impact of CTO-PCI on hard outcomes such as mortality and myocardial infarction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.