ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Reconstruction of the Vulva and Perineum-Comparison of Surgical Methods.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vulvar and perineal reconstruction represents a significant surgical challenge, particularly in the context of oncological resections, trauma, or postpartum injuries. Vulvar cancer, predominantly squamous cell carcinoma, often necessitates extensive resections, leading to significant tissue defects and high rates of postoperative complications. Reconstructive procedures, encompassing skin grafts and local, regional, and distant flaps, are intended to restore the anatomical structure, protect internal organs, and enhance functional outcomes and quality of life. The selection of technique is contingent upon the dimensions of the defect, its location, the patient's condition, and the availability of suitable tissue. The management of minor defects can be accomplished through local advancements, while more extensive or complex cases necessitate the utilization of musculocutaneous (e.g., VRAM) or fasciocutaneous (e.g., ALT) flaps. The present article provides a review of surgical methods of vulvar and perineal reconstruction, with a focus on indications, techniques, and potential complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.