ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Advances in Intracorneal Ring Segment (ICRS) Implantation for Keratoconus: A Comprehensive Literature Review, Clinical Insights, and Future Prospects.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Science and Clinical Evolution of Corneal Cross-Linking: Mechanism of Action, Ultra-Structural Changes, Clinical Indications, and Emerging Treatment Strategies.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2026Review
- A practical and efficient technique for corneal allogenic ring segment implantation: prolene suture-guided insertion.Cell and tissue banking · 2026Article
- Clinical Outcomes and Complications After INTACS Implantation in Keratoconus: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Corneal Tomography Changes After Simultaneous Topical Application of Cyclosporine and Trehalose in Keratoconus Evaluated with an Artificial Intelligence Model.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Keratoconus is a progressive corneal disorder that causes thinning and irregular astigmatism, often leading to significant visual impairment. In the advanced stages, surgical interventions are necessary to restore corneal shape, improve vision, and enhance contact lens tolerance. Intracorneal ring segments (ICRSs) have emerged as a well-established, minimally invasive option that not only improves vision but also has the potential to delay or prevent the need for corneal transplantation in advanced cases. Recent advancements in the ICRS implantation techniques, patient selection, and femtosecond laser technology have significantly improved the precision and safety of these procedures, reducing complications. The ability to customize the ring parameters-such as thickness, arc length, and positioning-enables a more individualized approach, particularly for patients with irregular astigmatism. Artificial intelligence (AI) is also emerging as a promising tool for optimizing ICRS planning and improving patient outcomes. Although still in the early stages, AI algorithms may refine the treatment strategies by analyzing large datasets, improving the patient selection, and predicting long-term outcomes. Corneal Allogenic Intrastromal Ring Segments (CAIRSs) offer a novel alternative to synthetic ICRSs, with advantages like improved biocompatibility and reduced extrusion risk. However, CAIRSs remain an evolving technique that requires further refinement and long-term evaluation to determine the tissue integration, the durability of the refractive outcomes, and the potential for late-onset complications. In conclusion, ICRSs continue to be a safe and effective option for managing advanced keratoconus. Ongoing refinement of the surgical approaches-combined with advancements such as femtosecond laser technology and the integration of AI-will ensure that both ICRSs and CAIRSs remain key components in the therapeutic arsenal for keratoconus, offering sustained visual improvements and the potential to delay or avoid corneal transplantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.