ArticleNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
MRE Encapsulating MRG: Synergistic Improvement in Modulus Tunability and Energy Dissipation.
Article in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Traditional magnetorheological elastomers (MREs) often suffer from limited modulus tunability and insufficient energy dissipation, which restrict their applications. This study prepared a novel composite material by an MR gel (MRG) embedded within the MRE, called the MRE encapsulating MRG, to synergistically enhance these properties. Annular and radial MRE encapsulating MRG configurations were fabricated using 3D-printed molds, and their dynamic mechanical performance was characterized under varying magnetic fields (0-1 T) via a rheometer. The results revealed that the composite materials demonstrated significantly improved magnetic-induced modulus and magnetorheological (MR) effects compared to conventional MREs. Specifically, the annular MRE encapsulating MRG exhibited a 238.47% increase in the MR effect and a 51.35% enhancement in the magnetic-induced modulus compared to traditional MREs. Correspondingly, the radial configuration showed respective improvements of 168.19% and 27.03%. Furthermore, both the annular and radial composites displayed superior energy dissipation capabilities, with loss factors 2.68 and 2.03 times greater than those of pure MREs, respectively. Dynamic response tests indicated that composite materials, particularly the annular MRE encapsulating MRG, achieve faster response times. These advancements highlight the composite's potential for high-precision damping systems, vibration isolation, and adaptive control applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.