ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2025
A Systematic Review of AI Performance in Lung Cancer Detection on CT Thorax.
Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Applications of artificial intelligence in dyspnoea management for patients with advanced lung cancer: a scoping review protocol.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Review
- AI in Lung Nodules on Chest CT: Retrospective, Real-World Assessment of AI in Clinical Practice.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Imaging and characterization of pulmonary nodules in children with solid tumors: what makes a pulmonary nodule a metastasis?Pediatric radiology · 2026Review
- Review
- Disparities in Lung Cancer Health Outcomes and Access to Lung Cancer Screening Between Rural and Urban Areas in the U.S.Cancers · 2026Review
- Taiwan's Smart Healthcare Value Chain: AI Innovation from R&D to Industry Deployment.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Diagnostic accuracy of AI in chest radiography for pneumonia and lung cancer: A meta-analysis.European journal of radiology open · 2025Article
- Updates in Lung Cancer Screening: A Decade of Evidence.Seminars in respiratory and critical care medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.