Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40648490›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Entropy, Irreversibility, and Time-Series Deep Learning of Kinematic and Kinetic Data for Gait Classification in Children with Cerebral Palsy, Idiopathic Toe Walking, and Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia.

Alfonso de Gorostegui, Massimiliano Zanin, Juan-Andrés Martín-Gonzalo, Javier López-López, David Gómez-Andrés, Damien Kiernan, Estrella Rausell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alfonso de GorosteguiPhD Program in Neuroscience, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid-Cajal Institute, 28029 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4093-9875
Massimiliano ZaninInstituto de Física Interdisciplinar y Sistemas Complejos IFISC (CSIC-UIB), Campus UIB, 07122 Palma de Mallorca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5839-0393
Juan-Andrés Martín-GonzaloEscuela Universitaria de Fisioterapia de la ONCE, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28034 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4949-0843
Javier López-LópezDepartment of Rehabilitation, Hospital Universitario Infanta Sofía, 28702 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9315-1048
David Gómez-AndrésPediatric Neurology, ERN-RND, Euro-NMD, Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, 08035 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5654-7791
Damien KiernanMovement Analysis Laboratory, Central Remedial Clinic, Clontarf, D03 R973 Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-5785-8831
Estrella RausellDepartment of Anatomy, Histology & Neuroscience, School of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), 28029 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1129-7116

Funding

Agencia Estatal de Investigación CEX2021-001164-MAgencia Estatal de Investigación CNS2023-144775European Research Council 851255
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of gait analysis to differentiate among paediatric populations with neurological and developmental conditions such as idiopathic toe walking (ITW), cerebral palsy (CP), and hereditary spastic paraplegia (HSP) remains challenging due to the insufficient precision of current diagnostic approaches, leading in some cases to misdiagnosis. Existing methods often isolate the analysis of gait variables, overlooking the whole complexity of biomechanical patterns and variations in motor control strategies. While previous studies have explored the use of statistical physics principles for the analysis of impaired gait patterns, gaps remain in integrating both kinematic and kinetic information or benchmarking these approaches against Deep Learning models. This study evaluates the robustness of statistical physics metrics in differentiating between normal and abnormal gait patterns and quantifies how the data source affects model performance. The analysis was conducted using gait data sets from two research institutions in Madrid and Dublin, with a total of 81 children with ITW, 300 with CP, 20 with HSP, and 127 typically developing children as controls. From each kinematic and kinetic time series, Shannon's entropy, permutation entropy, weighted permutation entropy, and time irreversibility metrics were derived and used with Random Forest models. The classification accuracy of these features was compared to a ResNet Deep Learning model. Further analyses explored the effects of inter-laboratory comparisons and the spatiotemporal resolution of time series on classification performance and evaluated the impact of age and walking speed with linear mixed models. The results revealed that statistical physics metrics were able to differentiate among impaired gait patterns, achieving classification scores comparable to ResNet. The effects of walking speed and age on gait predictability and temporal organisation were observed as disease-specific patterns. However, performance differences across laboratories limit the generalisation of the trained models. These findings highlight the value of statistical physics metrics in the classification of children with different toe walking conditions and point towards the need of multimetric integration to improve diagnostic accuracy and gain a more comprehensive understanding of gait disorders.

Indexed as

Cerebral PalsyDeep LearningGaitSpastic Paraplegia, HereditaryAdolescentBiomechanical PhenomenaChildChild, PreschoolEntropyFemaleHumansKineticsMaleWalkingcerebral palsydeep learningentropyhereditary spastic paraplegiaidiopathic toe walkingtime irreversibility

Identifiers

PMID40648490
PMCPMC12252522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.