ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Detecting Important Features and Predicting Yield from Defects Detected by SEM in Semiconductor Production.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Correction: Amato et al. Detecting Important Features and Predicting Yield from Defects Detected by SEM in Semiconductor Production.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A key step to optimize the tests of semiconductors during the production process is to improve the prediction of the final yield from the defects detected on the wafers during the production process. This study investigates the link between the defects detected by a Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) and the electrical failure of the final semiconductors, with two main objectives: (a) to identify the best layers to inspect by SEM; (b) to develop a model that predicts electrical failures of the semiconductors from the detected defects. The first objective has been reached by a model based on Odds Ratio that gave a (ranked) list of the layers that best predict the final yield. This allows process engineers to concentrate inspections on a few important layers. For the second objective, a regression/classification model based on Gradient Boosting has been developed. As a by-product, this latter model confirmed the results obtained by Odds Ratio analysis. Both models take account of the high lacunarity of the data and have been validated on two distinct datasets from STMicroelectronics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.