ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Tactile Interaction with Socially Assistive Robots for Children with Physical Disabilities.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Tactile regulation with pocket-sized robots: reducing movement and heart rate in children through hand-held interaction.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Children with physical disabilities are increasingly using socially assistive robots (SARs) as part of therapy to enhance motivation, engagement, enjoyment, and adherence. Research on SARs in rehabilitation has primarily focused on verbal and visual interaction, but little is known about tactile interaction (physical touch). The objective of this scoping review was to examine empirical studies published between 2010 and 2024 focusing on tactile interaction between SARs and children with physical disabilities, such as cerebral palsy (CP). Nine studies were identified as being eligible after a rigorous selection process, showing that although touch-based SAR interventions have been used in pediatric rehabilitation, structured methodologies and standardized tools are lacking for measuring tactile engagement. In light of the studies' findings, it is evident that few studies evaluate the therapeutic effects of touch-sensitive SARs, underscoring the need for validated frameworks to assess their efficacy. In this review, SAR and tactile sensing researchers, rehabilitation specialists, and designers are given critical insights into how tactile interaction can enhance the role of SARs in physical therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.